HERE (watch first) I found a video that outlines 10 reasons (I could only think of one) to love girls.
At the beginning of this fine piece of video montage (guess no actual footage of what makes them so lovable could be found) there is a clear disclaimer for men watching the video. It states that if you are of the "Y" chromosome, "words are useless" therefore these next ten must be equally as useless. While I appreciate the honesty, I doubt sex has much to do with the following words, and their usefulness in proving said point.
Never the less let's breakdown the evidence and see if we can't find a shred validity to the argument.
Reason #10
"Hands" - Okay off to a good start. Perhaps if they made more BLT's and or washed more dishes this may be a valid reason. Not to mention men have a perfectly good set of hands we've been building useful things, and jerking off with, for quite some time now. Plus if I sit on my own hands long enough I can pretend their yours anyways. So there!
Reason #9
"Hair" - Aside from it constantly getting in the way when giving a blow job, I guess it does provide some stability when approaching from the rear. But again, love is a strong word.
Reason #8
"Neck" - Aside from the love I would find in breaking it, the throat may have been a more redeeming asset. Although I assume the Edward Cullen's of the world would readily add this to their list as well.
Reason #7
"Eyes"- Ahhh, eyes are the gateway to the soul, hopefully your cans are big enough to deter us from the tiring journey.
Now we're getting HOTTER!
Reason #6
"Feet"- Foot jobs and all natural toe jam flavoured lube, what could be better?
Reason #5
"Breasts"- While being a great substitute for eye contact, I can't help but notice the turn this whole thing seems to be taking, and I'm appalled!
Women have been bitching for, what seems like an eternity about men "objectifying" them.
But am I the only one noticing that they do a quite exquisite job of that, on their own?
This entire video advertises every physical asset a woman possesses and completely disregards everything you want men to see in you. The video goes on to mention legs, asses, buns, and the"flower".
Now if you're not an idiot you may have clicked on the link above by clicking on the word
women (added again for the idiots).
Reading through this grammatical nightmare was no small feat, but the study she speaks of, conducted by National Geographic, I found interesting. Apparently when men come in visual contact with images of girls wearing bikinis, the region of the brain associated with tool use fires up. (Perhaps because you all require a lot of maintenance)
I'm sorry but I seem to be having trouble recalling the last time I browsed through a Sports Illustrated and wondered what Candy on pg. 43 might be doing in her spare time. Of course we view these barely dressed bimbos in a less than human way, is that not the intention of flaunting one's physical attributes in screaming decibels?
I'd like to see what part of the female brain ignites, when the shirtless wonder of the Twilight Saga walks on screen.
The combination of free spirited women and the media's portrayal of them have given us such timeless classics as: Maxim, Playboy, Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition etc. All these publications have something in common, they all contain countless images of barely clothed to naked women. The target obviously being men. The soul purpose of these images and publications is to arouse those men.
This of course plays on the fact that we are still of the animal kingdom. Therefore certain instincts and characteristics still need apply. Men are hard-wired to spread their seed as far and wide as possible (it's a sort of basic survival tactic), whereas women (like the countless scantily clad ones we see daily)are made to entice as many male suitors as possible, so as to have a choice in whom she wants to mate with (looking for the strongest and best genes).
In today's day and age these female tactics have not changed much, just evolved. Much like a Peacock spreads its feathers out to impress a desired mate, women today use dressing like whores to exact the same response from men.
I don't know about you but I find this test to be among the most bias I have ever read. Is it any wonder these men surveyed couldn't put a face to the bikini? That's like conversing with your buddy over a beer, telling him all about the chick you slammed last night. Then all of the sudden pop quiz; what colour were her toe nails painted? The most specific answer you can come up with runs along the lines of "they're all pink on the inside". Therein lies my point.
If you want us to see you for whats on the inside, stop wrapping the package up in the sluttiest wrapping paper you can get your hands on. We understand these skankoid outfits only represent your arsenal of seduction, that no doubt catches our immediate attention. But if it's a lasting impression you wanna make that will set you apart from your slut brigade counter parts, perhaps a more clothed approach may work better.
Yeah we love fucking sluts, in most cases the sluttier the better. Yet, if you want a call back that doesn't come at 3 AM on a Saturday, with a bonus boost of ye olde ego.
If you want eye contact there are tasteful ways to accentuate your winning features and not be mistaken for a prostitute. Want meaningful conversation, why not take his cock out of your mouth and use your words. Every man alive knows by now, that your push up bras, short shorts, and always visible G strings are just desperate cries for attention. Now it's your turn to decide what kind of attention you actually want to attract. And for those of you who still love that one dimensional kind of attention, we still need you, cuz sometimes the blow up doll just wont do.
